Return to the Aggression IAT page
						
						Implicit Attitude Test (IAT) Aggression-- Multilanguage Template
SCRIPT INFO

last updated: 01-12-2016 by K.Borchert (katjab@millisecond.com) for Millisecond Software LLC
Copyright © 01-12-2016 Millisecond Software


An IAT script measuring implicit aggressive attitudes towards self and others
using the generic IAT Inquisit framework by Millisecond Software, LLC.

Authors: Adnan Niazi (Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen) and 
Sabine Strofer (University of Twente)

Millisecond Software thanks A. Niazi and S. Strofer for generously sharing their script!


BACKGROUND INFO

This script was used in the following study:
http://figshare.com/articles/Effect_of_music_tempo_in_First-Person_Shooter_on_arousal_and_aggression/97000


The Implicit Association Task (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) is a widely-used cognitive-behavioral paradigm
that measures the strength of automatic (implicit) associations between concepts in people’s minds relying 
on latency measures in a simple sorting task.
 
The strength of an association between concepts is measured by the standardized mean difference score of 
the 'hypothesis-inconsistent' pairings and 'hypothesis-consistent' pairings (d-score) (Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003). 
In general, the higher the d-score the stronger is the association between the 'hypothesis-consistent' pairings 
(decided by researchers). Negative d-scores suggest a stronger association between the 'hypothesis-inconsistent' pairings.

Inquisit calculates d scores using the improved scoring algorithm as described in Greenwald et al (2003). 
Error trials are handled by requiring respondents to correct their responses according to recommendation (p.214).

D-scores obtained with this script:
Positive d-scores: support a stronger association between 'Me-Peaceful' and 'Others-Aggressive' than for the opposite pairings
Negative d-scores: support a stronger association between 'Others-Peaceful' and 'Me-Aggressive' than for the opposite pairings

References:
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: 
The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: 
I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.


											  *Task*
Participants are asked to categorize attributes (e.g. "calm"; "hateful") and target items (e.g "Me" vs. "Others") 
into predetermined categories via keystroke presses. The basic task is to press a left key (E) if an item (e.g. "calm")
belongs to the category presented on the left (e.g. "Peaceful") and to press the right key (I) if the word (e.g. "hateful") 
belongs to the category ("Aggressive") presented on the right.
For practice, participants sort items into the target categories "Me vs. Others" and the attribute categories "Peaceful vs. Aggressive".
For the test, participants are asked to sort categories into the paired/combined categories (e.g. 
"Me OR Peaceful" on the left vs. "Others OR Aggressive" on the right). Pairings are reversed for a second test 
(e.g. "Others OR Peaceful" on the left vs. "Me OR Aggressive" on the right). Order is counterbalanced by groupnumber.							  


DATA FILE INFORMATION: 
The default data stored in the data files are:

(1) Raw data file: 'AggressionIAT_raw*.iqdat' (a separate file for each participant)

build:								Inquisit build
computer.platform:					the platform the script was run on
/ languageoffset:					stores the selected language 
										0 = English
										1 = German
										2 = Dutch

blockcode:							the name of the current trial
blocknum:							the number of the current trial
trialcode:							the name of the current trial
trialnum:							the number of the current trial
response:							the final trial response (scancodes of the keys pressed)
										Note: script saves the final and -by design- correct response
correct:							the accuracy of the initial response
										0 = initial response was incorrect and needed to be corrected
										1 = initial response is correct
latency:							the latency of the final (correct) response
stimulusnumber:						the number of the current stimulus
stimulusitem:						the currently presented item
expressions.da:						d-score of the first blocks
expressions.db:						d-score of the second blocks
expressions.d:						overall d-score
percentcorrect:       				the overall percent correct score of initial responses of test trials of 
									D-score qualifying latencies

(2) Summary data file: 'AggressionIAT_summary*.iqdat' (a separate file for each participant)

script.startdate:					date script was run
script.starttime:					time script was started
script.subjectid:					subject id number
script.groupid:						group id number
script.elapsedtime:					time it took to run script (in ms)
computer.platform:					the platform the script was run on
/completed:							0 = script was not completed; 1 = script was completed (all conditions run)

/ languageoffset:					stores the selected language 
										0 = English
										1 = German
										2 = Dutch

expressions.da:						d-score of the first blocks
expressions.db:						d-score of the second blocks
expressions.d:						overall d-score
percentcorrect:       				the overall percent correct score of initial responses of test trials of 
									D-score qualifying latencies



EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP

Hypothesis-consistent pairings vs. hypothesis-inconsistent pairings; tested within-subjects 
=> order is counterbalanced by groupnumber assignment

Sequence:
1. Target Category sorting training
2. Attribute sorting training
3. 1. Test Block of hypothesis-consistent* pairings with 20 trials (half the participant start with inconsistent pairings)
4. 2. Test Block of hypothesis-consistent pairings with 40 trials
5. Target Category sorting training with targets switching sides
6. 1. Test Block of hypothesis-inconsistent pairings with 20 trials
7. 2. Test Block of hypothesis-inconsistent pairings with 40 trials

In all Test Blocks:
* attributes and targets alternate
* attributes as well as targets are randomly selected without replacement

STIMULI
Stimuli can be edited under section Editable Stimuli

INSTRUCTIONS
Instructions can be edited under section Editable Instructions

EDITABLE CODE:
check below for (relatively) easily editable parameters, stimuli, instructions etc. 
Keep in mind that you can use this script as a template and therefore always "mess" with the entire code to further customize your experiment.

The parameters you can change are:

/showsummaryfeedback:		set parameter showsummaryfeedback = true to display summary feedback to participants at the end (default)
							set parameter showsummaryfeedback = false if no summary feedback should be presented to participants

Copyright © Millisecond Software. All rights reserved.
Contact | Terms of Service | Security Statement | Employment