SUBLIMINAL
PERCEPTION AND
UNCONCIOUS
COGNITION
I received my Ph.D. from Department of Psychology at
the University of Washington in 1997. Currently (among other things)
I run a company called Millisecond Software, which produces Inquisit,
a popular experiment generator for creating and running reaction time experiments
on Windows PCs. The following are manuscripts I published with Tony Greenwald on Unconscious Cognition.
See Tony's web site for additional research on subliminal perception.
Send questions to Sean Draine or Tony Greenwald.
- Replicable Unconcious Semantic Priming
- Authors: Sean C. Draine and Anthony G. Greenwald
- Publication Info: Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General (1998).
- Formats:
[HTML]
[Word 6.0]
- Abstract: In four experiments, subjects classified
visually presented target words as pleasant/unpleasant words or
male/female first names. Prime words were similar (congruent) or
dissimilar (incongruent) in meaning to targets. Brief duration of prime
words (17, 33, or 50 ms), along with pre- and post-masking, prevented most
subjects from perceiving their physical and semantic properties. By
constraining response latencies to fall within a response window P a
narrow time band that occurred earlier than subjects would ordinarily
respond P these experiments consistently produced subliminal priming
effects, indicated by greater error rates for incongruent than congruent
priming trials. This conclusion was confirmed by analyzing magnitude of
priming as a regression function of prime perceptibility using the method
of Greenwald, Klinger, and Schuh (1995). The data of each experiment
passed their significant-intercept criterion for demonstrating unconscious
cognition.
- Analytic Limitations of Unconscious Language
Processing
- Author: Sean C. Draine
- Publication Info:
Doctoral Dissertation (1997).
- Formats:
[Word 6.0]
- Abstract: Cognitive theorists have assumed that
unconscious cognition, due to inherent analytic limitations, plays
a minor role in language comprehension relative to conscious
systems. The following research tested this assumption by
examining whether the analytic powers of unconscious cognition
include the ability to process the meanings morphologically
complex words and simple grammatical constructions. Four
experiments used variations of a two-choice, subliminal priming
paradigm (Greenwald, Draine, & Abrams, 1996) to assess unconscious
processing of (1) grammatically uncombinable word pairs, (2)
two-word grammatical negations, (3) one-word lexical negations,
(4) compound words, (5) and noun phrases. Experiments 1
demonstrated unconscious semantic processing of multiple,
uncombinable words. Experiment 2 demonstrated unconscious
sensitivity to the meanings of the constituents of two-word
phrases, but not to phrase-level meanings. Results of Experiment 3
showed weak evidence for unconscious processing of lexical
negation. In Experiment 4, priming effects were obtained for
supraliminal noun phrases and compound words, but subliminal
conditions showed no evidence for unconscious processing of the
primes. The findings indicate that unconscious linguistic analyses
are limited to activation of stored lexical representations of
morphologically simple words. Semantic representations of unstored
linguistic constructions such as phrases and morphologically
complex words, in contrast, are constructed on line by conscious
cognitive systems.
- Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic
Activation
- Authors: Anthony G. Greenwald and Sean C. Draine
- Publication Info: Science, 273, 1699-1702 (1996)
- Formats: [HTML]
- Abstract. A "response window" technique is described and
used to reliably demonstrate unconscious activation of meaning by
subliminal (visually masked) words. Visually masked prime words were shown
to influence judged meaning of following target words. This priming-effect
marker was used to identify two additional markers of unconscious semantic
activation: (i) the activation is very short-lived (the target word must
occur within about 100 milliseconds of the subliminal prime); and (ii)
unlike supraliminal prime-target pairs, a subliminal pair leaves no memory
trace that can be observed in response to the next prime-target pair.
Thus, unconscious semantic activation is shown to be a readily
reproducible phenomenon but also very limited in the duration of its
effect.
- Modeling Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments:
Finding the Proper Branch of the Correct (Multinomial) Tree
- Authors: Sean C. Draine, Anthony G. Greenwald, and Mahzarin R.
Banaji
- Publication Info: Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 221-225 (1996)
- Formats: [HTML]--[Word 6.0]--[WordPerfect 6.0]
- Abstract. In the preceding article, Buchner and Wippich
used a guessing-corrected, multinomial process-dissociation analysis to
test whether a gender bias in fame judgments reported by Banaji and
Greenwald (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68,
181-198) was unconscious. Buchner and Wippich concluded that the
gender-bias effect was not unconscious on the basis of finding no
difference in model-estimated familiarity between previously presented
nonfamous male and female names. This conclusion is questioned by noting
that (a) the gender difference in familiarity that Buchner and Wippich
modeled was different from the critical gender difference in criterion for
fame judgments reported by Banaji and Greenwald, (b) the assumptions of
Buchner and Wippich=s multinomial model exclude processes that are
plausibly involved in the fame judgment task, and (c) constructs of
Buchner and Wippich=s that correspond most closely to Banaji and
Greenwald=s gender-bias interpretation are formulated so as to preclude
modeling that interpretation.
- Unconscious Processing of Two-Word Negations: A 'Not
Bad' Experiment
- Authors: Sean C. Draine and Anthony G. Greenwald
- Publication Info: Poster presented at the meetings of APS, San
Francisco, CA (June, 1996)
- Formats: [Word 6.0]
- Abstract. Subjects classified simple evaluatively
polarized target words as pleasant or unpleasant in meaning. Target words
were preceded by primes involving either the negation of an evaluatively
polarized root word, or just the root word itself. Negated primes
consisted of root words preceded by "NOT" (e.g. "NOT CLEAN", "NOT DIRTY")
in Experiment 1, and root words preceded by prefixes such as "UN" and
"DIS" (e.g. "UNHURT", "DISLOYAL") in Experiment 2. Prime stimuli were
presented both subliminally (forward and backward masked) and
supraliminally (no masking). In both Experiments 1 and 2, evaluative
priming effects were obtained with supraliminal and subliminal primes. The
direction of these priming effects, however, was determined entirely by
the root words, and was uninfluenced by the presence of negation. This
result suggests that the operation of negation, whether morphological or
grammatical in form, exceeds the analytic capabilities of unconscious
cognition.
- Do Subliminal Stimuli Enter the Mind
Unnoticed? Tests with a New Method
- Authors: Anthony G. Greenwald and Sean C. Draine
- Publication Info: in J. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.)
Scientific Approaches to Consciousness: 25th Carnegie Symposium
on Cogntion. Hillsdale, NJ (1996)
- Formats: [Word 6.0]
- Abstract. Existing methods to test for subliminal
activation by undetectable stimuli have been criticized as intrisically
inconclusive. A new method, analyzing the regression relation between
direct and indirect measures of responses to near-threshold stimuli,
overcomes these criticisms. Obtained results indicated that subliminal
stimuli, even when unnoticed, influenced consciously guided performances.
Several potential criticisms of the new method are considered, but are
found not to undermine this conclusion.
Sean's WebSpace