IAT scores always minus! COUNTERBALANCING


Author
Message
Alkim
Alkim
Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1

Hello Guys,


I am conducting an axperiment on parental relationships and preferences, and there are two targets and two atributes.Almost all the of the participants are female and their IAT scores respectively minus (-). However, due to the presence of the counterbalancing in the scripts, during the interpretation the results seem insignificant such as;


Participants IAT scores;


... same


11. Female: - 0.55


12. Female: - 0.66


13. Female: - 0.39


14. Female: - 0.92


... same


Namely, if I attemp to interpret the results, half of the female participants have preferences for X over than Y and the other half of the female participants have preferences for Y over X. However the interesting point is the allingnment of the scores (preferences); According to the scores of the participants: X, Y, X, Y, X...



Before I commit suicide please help me!



Best Wishes,



Alkim



Dave
Dave
Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)Supreme Being (830K reputation)
Group: Administrators
Posts: 10K, Visits: 58K

Both the IAT scripts as well as the available SPSS syntax take counterbalancing into account as you can easily see by looking at the respective source code / syntax. Thus, a negative D-score always indicates an association of targetA with attributeB and targetB with attributeA. This is clearly the case for the example data you posted. To use your terminology, the preferences are X, X, X, X. Cf. https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic3444.aspx, Greenwald et al. (2003) as well as the Inquisit / SPSS syntax already mentioned.


Regards,


~Dave


Alkim
Alkim
Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)Respected Member (437 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1

Great thanks Dave.Now it makes sense.


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search