Repeating randomly created blocks


Author
Message
YCD
YCD
Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1



Hi all,


I'm wondering if anyone can help me figure out if the following combination of fixed and random blocking is possible:



I have 9 blocks that each involve a random pairing of two stimuli (it's a classical conditioning paradigm where a randomly selected neutral image is followed by a randomly selected positive or negative image).


I have these 9 blocks working fine.


The issue is that I want to present the same 9 blocks twice each in random order, but I want the pairings to be preserved such that the same pairs of stimuli reoccur each time the same block occurs.


But at least by default Inquisit pulls new random pairings the second time the same block is called, and I haven't been able to figure out how to stop that from occurring.


Anyone have suggestions? Or did I fail to explain this adequately?


Thanks,


YCD


Dave
Dave
Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)Supreme Being (782K reputation)
Group: Administrators
Posts: 10K, Visits: 51K

So you want randomly paired stimuli, but once the pairings have been made, they should remain unchanged throughout the entire experiment, right? Then essentially you need to do something akin to this: http://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic2623.aspx.


Regards,


~Dave



YCD
YCD
Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)Respected Member (477 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1

Hi Dave,



Thanks, this was a great help and I have it working more or less...


My case was a bit more complicated because I'm pairing positive or negative images with a third set of neutral images, but I was able to get that working based on your model.


The only thing I still haven't figured out (which isn't terribly important, but...) is whether it's possible to do this where the number of neutral images is larger than the number of positive or negative images (e.g. one of 6 positive images is paired with one of 12 neutral images drawn from a larger pool, and similar for 6 negative images). When I try this the program crashes, I think because the way the code is written it looks for a corresponding item number, and there are no number 7-12 of the positive and negative images.


Again, with your help I got the basics of what I need, so unless there is an obvious way to do the above, let's consider my problem solved!


Thanks again


YCD


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search