Inquisit Test Variants

Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) - Picture Template - English

An implicit attitude task by Barnes-Holmes et al (2006).

(Requires Inquisit Lab to run on your computer)

Run Demo
(See how the test runs with Inquisit Web)

User Manual

Sample Data

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2020, 5:37PM

Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) - Text Template - English

An implicit attitude task by Barnes-Holmes et al (2006).

(Requires Inquisit Lab to run on your computer)

Run Demo
(See how the test runs with Inquisit Web)

User Manual

Sample Data

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2020, 5:37PM

Mixed-Trial Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (MT-IRAP) - English

An implicit attitude task by Barnes-Holmes et al (2006).

(Requires Inquisit Lab to run on your computer)

Run Demo
(See how the test runs with Inquisit Web)

User Manual

Sample Data

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2020, 5:37PM

References

Find peer-reviewed, published research using the Inquisit Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP)

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you know what you really believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Evaluation Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32(7), 169–177.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010A). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 527.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Murtagh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2010B). Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to measure attitudes towards meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record, 60, 287-306.

Hussey, I., Mhaoileoin, D. N., Barnes-Holmes, D., Ohtsuki, T., Kishita, N., Hughes, S., & Murphy, C. (2016). The IRAP Is Nonrelative but notAcontextual: Changes to the Contrast Category Influence Men’s Dehumanization of Women. The Psychological Record, 66(2), 291– 299.